Sri Lankan vs Subsaharan African Currently Married
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Subsaharan African
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Sri Lankans
Sub-Saharan Africans
47.3%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Subsaharan African Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,506,479 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.120 and weighted average of 47.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,112,533 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 42.6%, a difference of 11.1%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sri Lankan | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 25.0% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 70.1% | 84.5% |
| Range | 45.1% | 82.7% |
| Mean | 47.1% | 40.3% |
| Median | 47.2% | 40.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 45.4% | 35.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 49.2% | 44.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 14.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 13.9% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Iraq (47.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Icelander (47.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Portuguese (47.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Afghan (47.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Jordan (47.4%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Osage | 87.9 /100 | #122 | Excellent 47.5% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 87.2 /100 | #123 | Excellent 47.4% |
| Laotians | 86.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 47.4% |
| Okinawans | 85.3 /100 | #125 | Excellent 47.4% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 84.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 47.4% |
| New Zealanders | 84.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 47.4% |
| Portuguese | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Sri Lankans | 83.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 82.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Afghans | 81.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 81.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 81.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 79.7 /100 | #135 | Good 47.2% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 78.2 /100 | #136 | Good 47.2% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yuman (42.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Honduran (42.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ghana (42.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 42.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 42.2% |