Ute vs European Female Disability
COMPARE
Ute
European
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Ute
Europeans
12.4%
FEMALE DISABILITY
14.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.4%
FEMALE DISABILITY
12.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
219th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs European Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,657,679 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.144 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 561,578,477 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Europeans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.488 and weighted average of 12.4%, a difference of 0.21%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | European |
| Minimum | 7.1% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 35.7% | 100.0% |
| Range | 28.7% | 98.8% |
| Mean | 15.9% | 21.2% |
| Median | 13.7% | 14.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.3% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.5% | 24.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 12.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 17.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.1% | 17.5% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Europeans by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Swiss (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Thailand (12.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Mexican (12.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and Panamanian (12.4%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Europeans are Immigrants from Bahamas (12.4%, a difference of 0.030%), British (12.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Bahamian (12.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (12.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and Panamanian (12.4%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 20.5 /100 | #205 | Fair 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 20.2 /100 | #206 | Fair 12.4% |
| Croatians | 20.2 /100 | #207 | Fair 12.4% |
| Basques | 17.5 /100 | #208 | Poor 12.4% |
| Mexicans | 15.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 12.4% |
| Swiss | 14.9 /100 | #210 | Poor 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 14.8 /100 | #211 | Poor 12.4% |
| Ute | 14.7 /100 | #212 | Poor 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 14.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 12.4% |
| Panamanians | 13.5 /100 | #214 | Poor 12.4% |
| Samoans | 13.4 /100 | #215 | Poor 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 13.3 /100 | #216 | Poor 12.4% |
| British | 12.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 12.5 /100 | #218 | Poor 12.4% |
| Europeans | 12.1 /100 | #219 | Poor 12.4% |
| Bahamians | 11.1 /100 | #220 | Poor 12.4% |
| Native Hawaiians | 10.8 /100 | #221 | Poor 12.4% |
| Italians | 10.7 /100 | #222 | Poor 12.4% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 9.5 /100 | #223 | Tragic 12.5% |
| Belizeans | 9.3 /100 | #224 | Tragic 12.5% |
| Poles | 8.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 12.5% |