Puerto Rican vs Ute Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Puerto Rican
Ute
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Puerto Ricans
Ute
3.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Puerto Rican vs Ute Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 527,769,112 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Puerto Ricans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.440 and weighted average of 3.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,656,713 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.134 and weighted average of 3.5%, a difference of 0.95%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Puerto Rican | Ute |
Minimum | 1.3% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 14.8% | 10.9% |
Range | 13.5% | 9.3% |
Mean | 3.7% | 5.3% |
Median | 3.2% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.1% | 6.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Puerto Ricans and Ute by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Puerto Ricans are Fijian (3.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Swiss (3.5%, a difference of 0.32%), Czech (3.5%, a difference of 0.33%), Czechoslovakian (3.6%, a difference of 0.53%), and European (3.5%, a difference of 0.59%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Spaniard (3.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Canadian (3.5%, a difference of 0.32%), European (3.5%, a difference of 0.35%), Belgian (3.5%, a difference of 0.54%), and Czech (3.5%, a difference of 0.61%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Hawaiians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 3.5% |
Immigrants | North America | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 3.5% |
Immigrants | Canada | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 3.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 3.5% |
British | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 3.5% |
Belgians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 3.5% |
Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 3.5% |
Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 3.5% |
Ute | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 3.5% |
Europeans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 3.5% |
Czechs | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 3.5% |
Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 3.5% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 3.5% |
Swiss | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 3.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 3.6% |
Danes | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 3.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 3.6% |
Basques | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 3.6% |
Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 3.6% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 3.6% |
Scandinavians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 3.6% |