Czechoslovakian vs Subsaharan African Average Family Size
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Subsaharan African
Average Family Size
Average Family Size Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Sub-Saharan Africans
3.13
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.25
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
81.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Subsaharan African Average Family Size Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,525,385 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.442 and weighted average of 3.13. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,604,346 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.174 and weighted average of 3.25, a difference of 3.9%.
Average Family Size Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 1.53 | 1.39 |
| Maximum | 4.91 | 4.61 |
| Range | 3.38 | 3.22 |
| Mean | 2.86 | 3.30 |
| Median | 2.95 | 3.29 |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.59 | 3.21 |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.07 | 3.44 |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.48 | 0.23 |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.54 | 0.54 |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.54 | 0.54 |
Similar Demographics by Average Family Size
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Northern European (3.13, a difference of 0.020%), Slavic (3.13, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.13, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Australia (3.13, a difference of 0.060%), and Bulgarian (3.13, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
| British | 0.2 /100 | #303 | Tragic 3.13 |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.2 /100 | #304 | Tragic 3.13 |
| Australians | 0.1 /100 | #305 | Tragic 3.13 |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 0.1 /100 | #306 | Tragic 3.13 |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 0.1 /100 | #307 | Tragic 3.13 |
| Slavs | 0.1 /100 | #308 | Tragic 3.13 |
| Northern Europeans | 0.1 /100 | #309 | Tragic 3.13 |
| Czechoslovakians | 0.1 /100 | #310 | Tragic 3.13 |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 0.1 /100 | #311 | Tragic 3.13 |
| Immigrants | Australia | 0.1 /100 | #312 | Tragic 3.13 |
| Bulgarians | 0.1 /100 | #313 | Tragic 3.13 |
| Russians | 0.1 /100 | #314 | Tragic 3.12 |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 0.1 /100 | #315 | Tragic 3.12 |
| Serbians | 0.1 /100 | #316 | Tragic 3.12 |
| Italians | 0.1 /100 | #317 | Tragic 3.12 |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Ethiopia (3.25, a difference of 0.0%), Venezuelan (3.25, a difference of 0.0%), Cuban (3.25, a difference of 0.010%), Liberian (3.25, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (3.25, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 86.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 3.26 |
| Africans | 84.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Panamanians | 84.2 /100 | #135 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Comanche | 82.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 82.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Cubans | 81.8 /100 | #138 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 81.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 81.6 /100 | #140 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Venezuelans | 81.4 /100 | #141 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Liberians | 81.2 /100 | #142 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Bhutanese | 81.0 /100 | #143 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Tsimshian | 80.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Armenians | 78.2 /100 | #145 | Good 3.25 |
| Immigrants | Africa | 77.9 /100 | #146 | Good 3.25 |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 75.7 /100 | #147 | Good 3.24 |