Creek vs Apache Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Creek
 Apache
 Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Creek
Apache
4.4%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Apache Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,433,224 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.170 and weighted average of 4.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 231,022,751 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Apache and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.061 and weighted average of 4.1%, a difference of 6.8%.
 
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Apache | 
| Minimum | 1.6% | 1.2% | 
| Maximum | 13.4% | 28.3% | 
| Range | 11.8% | 27.1% | 
| Mean | 6.1% | 7.8% | 
| Median | 5.6% | 6.7% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 5.1% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.1% | 8.3% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 3.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 4.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 4.8% | 
Demographics Similar to Creek and Apache by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 0.71%), Aleut (4.3%, a difference of 2.0%), Chickasaw (4.5%, a difference of 2.5%), Dutch West Indian (4.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 2.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Osage (4.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Seminole (4.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Paiute (4.1%, a difference of 0.38%), Lumbee (4.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and Potawatomi (4.1%, a difference of 0.68%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319  | Tragic 4.0%  | 
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #320  | Tragic 4.0%  | 
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #321  | Tragic 4.1%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322  | Tragic 4.1%  | 
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #323  | Tragic 4.1%  | 
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #324  | Tragic 4.1%  | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #325  | Tragic 4.1%  | 
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #326  | Tragic 4.1%  | 
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #327  | Tragic 4.1%  | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 4.2%  | 
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 4.2%  | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 4.2%  | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 4.2%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 4.2%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 4.3%  | 
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 4.3%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 4.3%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 4.4%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 4.5%  | 
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 4.5%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 4.5%  |