Creek vs Tsimshian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Creek
Tsimshian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Creek
Tsimshian
4.4%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Tsimshian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,433,224 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.170 and weighted average of 4.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,462 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.080 and weighted average of 4.7%, a difference of 7.7%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Tsimshian |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 3.1% |
| Maximum | 13.4% | 15.4% |
| Range | 11.8% | 12.3% |
| Mean | 6.1% | 7.9% |
| Median | 5.6% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.1% | 13.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Creek and Tsimshian by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 0.71%), Aleut (4.3%, a difference of 2.0%), Chickasaw (4.5%, a difference of 2.5%), Dutch West Indian (4.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 2.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Inupiat (4.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Navajo (4.6%, a difference of 1.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Tlingit-Haida (4.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 5.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 5.3% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 5.8% |