Navajo vs Tsimshian Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Navajo
Tsimshian
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Navajo
Tsimshian
15.5%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
330th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Navajo vs Tsimshian Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,738,454 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Navajo and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.040 and weighted average of 15.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,462 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.497 and weighted average of 16.7%, a difference of 8.0%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Navajo | Tsimshian |
Minimum | 0.53% | 11.4% |
Maximum | 52.8% | 29.2% |
Range | 52.3% | 17.8% |
Mean | 18.8% | 19.4% |
Median | 17.3% | 15.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.1% | 12.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.8% | 27.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.7% | 15.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.4% | 7.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Navajo and Tsimshian by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Cherokee (15.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Dutch West Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.92%), Cajun (15.3%, a difference of 0.96%), Pueblo (15.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and Native/Alaskan (15.3%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Creek (16.9%, a difference of 0.97%), Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and Pima (16.1%, a difference of 3.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 15.1% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 15.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 15.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 15.5% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |