Immigrants from Chile vs Bhutanese Female Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Bhutanese
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Bhutanese
11.5%
FEMALE DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
70th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.5%
FEMALE DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Bhutanese Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,627,850 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.804 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,486,745 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.019 and weighted average of 11.5%, a difference of 0.21%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 5.3% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 46.7% | 28.3% |
| Range | 41.4% | 26.9% |
| Mean | 12.2% | 11.4% |
| Median | 10.6% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.5% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.9% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and Bhutanese by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Colombian (11.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ireland (11.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Vietnam (11.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and Chilean (11.5%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Switzerland (11.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Chilean (11.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Lebanon (11.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Eritrea (11.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Afghanistan (11.5%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Sri Lankans | 99.9 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 99.9 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Salvadorans | 99.8 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Colombians | 99.8 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 99.8 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Chileans | 99.8 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.8 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.7 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.7 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.7 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.7 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 11.6% |