Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Sudan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,999,136 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.307. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.042% in Immigrants from Sudan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to a decrease of 41.9 Immigrants from Sudan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,159 compared to $86,109, a difference of 12.8%), householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $46,791, a difference of 12.1%), and median household income ($88,388 compared to $79,103, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $38,511, a difference of 4.8%), householder income over 65 years ($62,354 compared to $59,248, a difference of 5.2%), and median earnings ($47,697 compared to $44,767, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 21.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 17.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 3.5%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 17.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 13.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.89%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 17.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (46.5% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 11.0%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 10.1%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.66%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.65%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.7%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (88.9% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 15.9%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.3%).