Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Honduras Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 175,830,519 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Honduras within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.105% in Immigrants from Honduras. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 104.8 Immigrants from Honduras.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($105,655 compared to $83,618, a difference of 26.4%), per capita income ($46,213 compared to $36,665, a difference of 26.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,159 compared to $77,328, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $48,267, a difference of 8.6%), wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 9.4%), and median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $34,647, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (15.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 44.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 43.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 9.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 12.2%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 30.9%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.0%), and births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.61%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.36, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.30%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.89%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 54.3%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 52.5%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 19.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 17.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.83%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 5.3%).