Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Canada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,944,077 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.009. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Canada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to a decrease of 1.6 Immigrants from Canada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 12.4%), median male earnings ($57,352 compared to $60,388, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,880 compared to $102,616, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $41,373, a difference of 0.37%), householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $64,952, a difference of 2.1%), and median earnings ($48,913 compared to $50,192, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.8%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.010%), single mother poverty (28.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and single female poverty (20.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.10%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.4%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.36%), family households (63.5% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.83%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 12.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 13.9%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and bachelor's degree (42.6% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.9% compared to 69.1%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 19.9%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 17.3%), and male disability (10.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 0.90%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 3.3%).