Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Canada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,402,328 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.398. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.090% in Immigrants from Canada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to a decrease of 90.1 Immigrants from Canada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 6.4%), median female earnings ($43,099 compared to $41,373, a difference of 4.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $53,411, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $64,952, a difference of 1.0%), median household income ($93,602 compared to $92,029, a difference of 1.7%), and median male earnings ($61,422 compared to $60,388, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 7.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.7%), and receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.050%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 17.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.92%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.0%), married-couple households (46.0% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 5.3%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.12, a difference of 0.60%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (25.9% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 38.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 13.3%), master's degree (19.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 10.8%), and professional degree (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 16.5%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.1%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.3%).