Chinese vs South African In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Chinese
South African
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Chinese
South Africans
85.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
89.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
85.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
88.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs South African In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,795 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.486 and weighted average of 85.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,546,493 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 85.0%, a difference of 0.030%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | South African |
| Minimum | 64.1% | 73.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 35.9% | 26.4% |
| Mean | 87.3% | 86.0% |
| Median | 86.4% | 85.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 83.3% | 80.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 90.6% | 90.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 9.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and South Africans by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Israel (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), New Zealander (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Western Africa (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Spain (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Chile (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Sri Lankan (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Jordanian (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Bhutanese (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Chile (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Asia (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Australians | 92.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 91.5 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Austrians | 90.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Slavs | 90.7 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 90.6 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 90.2 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 90.0 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Chinese | 89.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 89.5 /100 | #132 | Excellent 85.0% |
| New Zealanders | 89.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 89.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 88.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Jordanians | 88.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 85.0% |
| South Africans | 88.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Sri Lankans | 87.8 /100 | #138 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Bhutanese | 87.5 /100 | #139 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #140 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Chileans | 85.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 84.3 /100 | #142 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Colombians | 82.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Uruguayans | 78.5 /100 | #144 | Good 84.9% |