Lumbee vs Pima Family Poverty
COMPARE
Lumbee
Pima
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Lumbee
Pima
17.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Pima Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,238,507 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.002 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,531,194 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.592 and weighted average of 18.4%, a difference of 8.0%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee | Pima |
| Minimum | 3.7% | 7.2% |
| Maximum | 47.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 43.3% | 92.8% |
| Mean | 20.6% | 29.5% |
| Median | 20.2% | 23.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.5% | 13.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.9% | 34.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.4% | 21.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.4% | 23.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 22.7% |
Demographics Similar to Lumbee and Pima by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Pueblo (17.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Yuman (16.6%, a difference of 2.1%), Immigrants from Yemen (17.5%, a difference of 2.8%), Crow (16.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and Hopi (15.9%, a difference of 6.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Yup'ik (18.7%, a difference of 1.8%), Navajo (18.8%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from Yemen (17.5%, a difference of 5.1%), Pueblo (17.0%, a difference of 8.1%), and Yuman (16.6%, a difference of 10.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 20.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 20.4% |