Choctaw vs Blackfeet Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Choctaw
Blackfeet
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Choctaw
Blackfeet
17.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.5%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
305th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Blackfeet Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,568,106 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.512 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,257,695 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.152 and weighted average of 15.5%, a difference of 9.6%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw | Blackfeet |
| Minimum | 5.0% | 10.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 95.0% | 89.7% |
| Mean | 30.9% | 44.4% |
| Median | 23.9% | 37.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.5% | 24.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.3% | 59.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.8% | 35.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.3% | 26.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.1% | 26.1% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw and Blackfeet by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Immigrants from Yemen (16.9%, a difference of 0.72%), Creek (16.8%, a difference of 0.83%), Shoshone (16.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 3.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Blackfeet are Pennsylvania German (15.6%, a difference of 0.43%), Ute (15.7%, a difference of 1.2%), Potawatomi (15.8%, a difference of 1.8%), American (15.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and Yakama (15.9%, a difference of 2.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |