Scandinavian vs Chippewa Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Scandinavian
Chippewa
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Scandinavians
Chippewa
13.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
12.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
218th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scandinavian vs Chippewa Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 403,484,518 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,626,002 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.305 and weighted average of 16.4%, a difference of 24.7%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scandinavian | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 5.2% | 9.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 77.8% |
| Range | 94.8% | 68.3% |
| Mean | 37.9% | 26.4% |
| Median | 25.7% | 23.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.5% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 39.3% | 30.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 24.8% | 13.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 33.3% | 14.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 32.8% | 14.5% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Scandinavians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are Bermudan (13.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (13.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Austrian (13.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Japanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and Zimbabwean (13.1%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Swedes | 16.8 /100 | #211 | Poor 13.1% |
| Senegalese | 16.4 /100 | #212 | Poor 13.1% |
| Italians | 15.9 /100 | #213 | Poor 13.1% |
| Zimbabweans | 14.9 /100 | #214 | Poor 13.1% |
| Japanese | 14.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 13.1% |
| Austrians | 13.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 13.1% |
| Bermudans | 13.0 /100 | #217 | Poor 13.1% |
| Scandinavians | 12.9 /100 | #218 | Poor 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 12.6 /100 | #219 | Poor 13.1% |
| Central Americans | 10.9 /100 | #220 | Poor 13.2% |
| New Zealanders | 10.7 /100 | #221 | Poor 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 10.0 /100 | #222 | Poor 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 9.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Somalis | 9.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 8.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 13.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Chickasaw (16.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.61%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |