Immigrants from Central America vs Australian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Central America
Australian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Central America
Australians
24.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
297th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
88.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Central America vs Australian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 523,015,170 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.771 and weighted average of 24.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,875,753 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.723 and weighted average of 20.3%, a difference of 22.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Central America | Australian |
Minimum | 11.1% | 8.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 88.9% | 91.9% |
Mean | 35.5% | 31.8% |
Median | 28.8% | 24.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.6% | 19.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.4% | 33.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.8% | 14.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.4% | 22.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.3% | 22.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Central America by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Central America are Yaqui (24.9%, a difference of 0.19%), African (24.8%, a difference of 0.28%), Hispanic or Latino (24.6%, a difference of 0.76%), Mexican (25.0%, a difference of 0.86%), and Blackfeet (25.1%, a difference of 0.94%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 24.3% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 24.4% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 24.5% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 24.5% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 24.6% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 24.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 24.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 24.8% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 24.9% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 25.0% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 25.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 25.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 25.1% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uganda (20.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from North America (20.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Syrian (20.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Kuwait (20.3%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |