Apache vs Chinese Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
COMPARE
Apache
 Chinese
 Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Comparison
Apache
Chinese
25.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Apache vs Chinese Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,703,796 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Apache and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.128 and weighted average of 25.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,186,861 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.065 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 91.4%.
 
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Apache | Chinese | 
| Minimum | 16.9% | 1.9% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 53.8% | 
| Range | 83.1% | 52.0% | 
| Mean | 47.1% | 14.4% | 
| Median | 39.2% | 12.1% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 28.6% | 6.7% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 64.1% | 18.8% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 35.5% | 12.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.2% | 10.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.9% | 10.7% | 
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Demographics Similar to Apache by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Kiowa (24.5%, a difference of 2.2%), Native/Alaskan (25.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Black/African American (25.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Colville (25.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and Creek (24.2%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 | 
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 23.9% | 
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 23.9% | 
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 24.0% | 
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 24.1% | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 24.1% | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 24.2% | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 24.5% | 
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 25.0% | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 25.6% | 
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.7% | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.7% | 
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 26.9% | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 27.4% | 
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 27.7% | 
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 27.7% | 
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Iranian (13.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Iran (13.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Burmese (13.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Korea (13.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 | 
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 11.5% | 
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.6% | 
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.6% | 
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 12.3% | 
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 12.4% | 
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.9% | 
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 13.1% | 
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 13.1% | 
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 13.1% | 
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 13.2% | 
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 13.2% | 
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.3% | 
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.4% | 
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.4% | 
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.4% |