Apache vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Apache
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Apache
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
9.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Apache vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 230,238,952 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Apache and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.728 and weighted average of 9.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,574,773 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.065 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 106.0%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Apache | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Minimum | 4.3% | 0.84% |
| Maximum | 52.5% | 10.5% |
| Range | 48.2% | 9.7% |
| Mean | 17.8% | 4.3% |
| Median | 12.6% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.0% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.5% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.2% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.0% | 2.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Apache by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Yakama (9.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Sioux (8.7%, a difference of 2.9%), Cheyenne (9.4%, a difference of 5.4%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (8.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and Crow (9.6%, a difference of 6.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 11.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Immigrants from Netherlands (4.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Czechoslovakian (4.4%, a difference of 0.090%), French (4.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Austrian (4.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Welsh (4.3%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Okinawans | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.4% |