Turkish vs Filipino In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Turkish
Filipino
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Turks
Filipinos
66.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Filipino In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,859,072 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.137 and weighted average of 66.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,350,604 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.535 and weighted average of 65.9%, a difference of 0.27%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Filipino |
| Minimum | 31.7% | 38.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 73.7% |
| Range | 68.3% | 35.3% |
| Mean | 63.7% | 62.6% |
| Median | 65.9% | 63.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.4% | 59.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 66.8% | 66.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Filipinos by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Malaysian (66.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Asia (66.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Moroccan (66.1%, a difference of 0.060%), German Russian (66.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Jordan (66.1%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Bangladeshi (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Chile (65.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Cambodia (66.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Uruguay (66.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from South America (66.0%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.6 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Turks | 99.6 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Malaysians | 99.6 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Moroccans | 99.5 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| German Russians | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Central Americans | 99.4 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Mongolians | 99.4 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| South Americans | 99.4 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| South American Indians | 99.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Bermudans | 99.3 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Iranians | 99.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Aleuts | 99.1 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 99.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 99.1 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 98.9 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 98.9 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.7 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 65.9% |