Latvian vs Icelander In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Latvian
Icelander
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Latvians
Icelanders
65.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
89.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
94.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Icelander In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,727,304 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 65.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,668,800 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016 and weighted average of 65.6%, a difference of 0.19%.

In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Latvian | Icelander |
Minimum | 28.6% | 39.9% |
Maximum | 89.2% | 74.5% |
Range | 60.6% | 34.6% |
Mean | 59.3% | 57.1% |
Median | 60.8% | 56.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 52.9% | 50.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 66.1% | 65.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.2% | 14.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.7% | 8.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.6% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Icelanders by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Indian (Asian) (65.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Romania (65.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Samoan (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Tlingit-Haida (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (65.5%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Immigrants from Guatemala (65.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Philippines (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Ecuadorian (65.6%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (65.7%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Ecuadorians | 94.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 94.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 94.4 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Icelanders | 94.3 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 94.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 93.5 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Costa Ricans | 93.2 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Guatemalans | 92.5 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 92.4 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 92.4 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 92.0 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 90.8 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 90.8 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Samoans | 90.5 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Indians (Asian) | 89.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 65.5% |
Latvians | 89.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 65.5% |
Immigrants | Romania | 88.6 /100 | #144 | Excellent 65.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 88.3 /100 | #145 | Excellent 65.5% |
Cypriots | 88.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 65.5% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 87.5 /100 | #147 | Excellent 65.5% |