Latvian vs Indian (Asian) In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Latvian
Indian (Asian)
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Latvians
Indians (Asian)
65.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
89.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
89.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Indian (Asian) In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,727,304 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 65.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 495,373,057 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.440 and weighted average of 65.5%, a difference of 0.0%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Latvian | Indian (Asian) |
| Minimum | 28.6% | 46.3% |
| Maximum | 89.2% | 82.9% |
| Range | 60.6% | 36.6% |
| Mean | 59.3% | 64.1% |
| Median | 60.8% | 64.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 52.9% | 61.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 66.1% | 66.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.2% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.7% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.6% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Indians (Asian) by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Immigrants from Romania (65.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Samoan (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Tlingit-Haida (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Taiwan (65.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (65.5%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Immigrants from Romania (65.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Samoan (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Tlingit-Haida (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Taiwan (65.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (65.5%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 94.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 93.5 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Costa Ricans | 93.2 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Guatemalans | 92.5 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 92.4 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 92.4 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 92.0 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 90.8 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 90.8 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Samoans | 90.5 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Indians (Asian) | 89.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Latvians | 89.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 88.6 /100 | #144 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 88.3 /100 | #145 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Cypriots | 88.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 87.5 /100 | #147 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Bhutanese | 86.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 85.7 /100 | #149 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 81.9 /100 | #150 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Czechs | 81.5 /100 | #151 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Yugoslavians | 81.3 /100 | #152 | Excellent 65.4% |