Latvian vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Latvian
Chickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Latvians
Chickasaw
65.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
89.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,727,304 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 65.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,722,257 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 62.3%, a difference of 5.2%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Latvian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 28.6% | 28.7% |
| Maximum | 89.2% | 76.1% |
| Range | 60.6% | 47.4% |
| Mean | 59.3% | 55.2% |
| Median | 60.8% | 56.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 52.9% | 50.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 66.1% | 61.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.2% | 10.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.7% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.6% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age > 16
Demographics Similar to Latvians by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Indian (Asian) (65.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Romania (65.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Samoan (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Tlingit-Haida (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (65.5%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 92.4 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 92.4 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 92.0 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 90.8 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 90.8 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Samoans | 90.5 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Indians (Asian) | 89.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Latvians | 89.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 88.6 /100 | #144 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 88.3 /100 | #145 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Cypriots | 88.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 87.5 /100 | #147 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Bhutanese | 86.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 85.7 /100 | #149 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 81.9 /100 | #150 | Excellent 65.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Kiowa (62.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Arapaho (62.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Yakama (62.1%, a difference of 0.25%), American (62.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and Ottawa (62.0%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 62.8% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 62.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 62.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 62.3% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.9% |