Chickasaw vs Japanese In Labor Force | Age 25-29
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Japanese
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Comparison
Chickasaw
Japanese
81.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
317th/ 347
METRIC RANK
84.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
11.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Japanese In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,700,460 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189 and weighted average of 81.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,141,498 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.061 and weighted average of 84.3%, a difference of 3.0%.
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Japanese |
| Minimum | 37.2% | 52.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 62.8% | 47.1% |
| Mean | 79.6% | 83.1% |
| Median | 79.3% | 84.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 74.0% | 81.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 88.2% | 85.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.2% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.5% | 8.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.4% | 7.9% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Comanche (81.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Mexican (81.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Mexico (82.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Seminole (81.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and Colville (81.6%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 82.3% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 82.3% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 82.2% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 82.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 82.1% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 82.0% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.9% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 81.7% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 81.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 81.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 81.6% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 81.6% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 81.2% |
Demographics Similar to Japanese by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Subsaharan African (84.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Lebanese (84.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Syria (84.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Jordan (84.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Chinese (84.3%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 14.3 /100 | #206 | Poor 84.4% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 13.3 /100 | #207 | Poor 84.4% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 13.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 84.4% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 12.8 /100 | #209 | Poor 84.4% |
| Chinese | 12.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 84.3% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 12.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 84.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 11.7 /100 | #212 | Poor 84.3% |
| Japanese | 11.4 /100 | #213 | Poor 84.3% |
| Lebanese | 11.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 84.3% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 10.7 /100 | #215 | Poor 84.3% |
| Israelis | 9.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 84.3% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 9.3 /100 | #217 | Tragic 84.3% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 9.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 84.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 8.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 84.3% |
| Nigerians | 7.2 /100 | #220 | Tragic 84.3% |