Celtic vs Yakama Female Disability
COMPARE
Celtic
Yakama
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Celtics
Yakama
13.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
294th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.2%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Yakama Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,857,089 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.085 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,917,587 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.126 and weighted average of 13.2%, a difference of 0.31%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Celtic | Yakama |
Minimum | 4.6% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 42.6% | 22.2% |
Range | 38.0% | 19.9% |
Mean | 16.5% | 14.3% |
Median | 14.7% | 13.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.7% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.9% | 16.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and Yakama by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Marshallese (13.3%, a difference of 0.050%), French (13.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Nepalese (13.3%, a difference of 0.34%), Slovak (13.3%, a difference of 0.38%), and Shoshone (13.2%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Shoshone (13.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Tlingit-Haida (13.2%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Yemen (13.2%, a difference of 0.23%), Marshallese (13.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and White/Caucasian (13.2%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
English | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 13.1% |
Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 13.1% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 13.1% |
Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 13.1% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 13.2% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 13.2% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 13.2% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 13.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 13.2% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 13.3% |
Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 13.3% |
French | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 13.3% |
Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 13.3% |
Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 13.4% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 13.4% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 13.4% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 13.5% |