Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Chile Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Immigrants from Chile
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Zimbabweans
Immigrants from Chile
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
89.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Chile Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,200,821 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.035 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,621,382 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.066 and weighted average of 2.8%, a difference of 1.1%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from Chile |
| Minimum | 0.53% | 0.32% |
| Maximum | 6.9% | 6.8% |
| Range | 6.4% | 6.5% |
| Mean | 3.0% | 2.9% |
| Median | 2.9% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 0.83% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 1.2% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Immigrants from Chile by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Kenyan (2.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants (2.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Jordanian (2.8%, a difference of 0.11%), and Cuban (2.8%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Honduran (2.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Guatemalan (2.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Turkish (2.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Cypriot (2.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and Moroccan (2.8%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Burmese | 94.2 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Moroccans | 93.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Hondurans | 93.4 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Guatemalans | 93.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Turks | 93.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cypriots | 92.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 92.7 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 92.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 91.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cambodians | 91.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 90.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |