Pima vs Immigrants from Malaysia Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Pima
 Immigrants from Malaysia
 Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Pima
Immigrants from Malaysia
18.8%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.1%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
79.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Immigrants from Malaysia Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,542,171 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.421 and weighted average of 18.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,973,854 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.134 and weighted average of 17.1%, a difference of 9.8%.
 
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Immigrants from Malaysia | 
| Minimum | 6.9% | 3.5% | 
| Maximum | 30.2% | 33.4% | 
| Range | 23.3% | 29.9% | 
| Mean | 19.0% | 16.4% | 
| Median | 18.4% | 15.7% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.0% | 13.4% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.6% | 18.0% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 4.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 5.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 5.5% | 
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Pima by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Immigrants from Sudan (18.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (18.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Yemen (18.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Navajo (18.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Kiowa (18.7%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability | 
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 18.7% | 
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 18.7% | 
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.7% | 
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.7% | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.7% | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.8% | 
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 18.8% | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 18.8% | 
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 18.8% | 
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 18.8% | 
| Sudanese | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 18.9% | 
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 19.0% | 
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 19.0% | 
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 19.1% | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 19.1% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Brazilian (17.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Sri Lankan (17.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (17.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Australia (17.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (17.1%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability | 
| Scotch-Irish | 85.9 /100 | #147 | Excellent 17.1% | 
| French Canadians | 85.7 /100 | #148 | Excellent 17.1% | 
| Cypriots | 85.7 /100 | #149 | Excellent 17.1% | 
| Basques | 85.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 17.1% | 
| Syrians | 83.0 /100 | #151 | Excellent 17.1% | 
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 82.7 /100 | #152 | Excellent 17.1% | 
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 17.1% | 
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 79.3 /100 | #154 | Good 17.1% | 
| Brazilians | 78.9 /100 | #155 | Good 17.1% | 
| Sri Lankans | 78.9 /100 | #156 | Good 17.1% | 
| Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 17.1% | 
| Celtics | 74.1 /100 | #158 | Good 17.1% | 
| Immigrants | Latvia | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 17.2% | 
| Australians | 72.4 /100 | #160 | Good 17.2% | 
| Americans | 72.2 /100 | #161 | Good 17.2% |