Malaysian vs Japanese Vision Disability
COMPARE
Malaysian
Japanese
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Malaysians
Japanese
2.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
241st/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
253rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Malaysian vs Japanese Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,017,600 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.096 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,077,012 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.715 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 1.5%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Malaysian | Japanese |
Minimum | 0.52% | 0.43% |
Maximum | 12.2% | 14.1% |
Range | 11.7% | 13.7% |
Mean | 3.1% | 3.6% |
Median | 2.4% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.6% | 3.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 1.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Malaysians and Japanese by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Panamanian (2.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Panama (2.3%, a difference of 0.14%), English (2.3%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Cambodia (2.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Portugal (2.3%, a difference of 0.57%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Micronesia (2.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Haitian (2.4%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Guatemala (2.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Laos (2.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Bangladeshi (2.3%, a difference of 0.50%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Portugal | 1.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 1.1 /100 | #238 | Tragic 2.3% |
English | 1.1 /100 | #239 | Tragic 2.3% |
Panamanians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 2.3% |
Malaysians | 0.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Panama | 0.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 2.3% |
Alsatians | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 2.3% |
French | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 2.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 2.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 2.3% |
Liberians | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 2.3% |
Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 2.4% |
Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.4% |
Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 2.4% |
West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 2.4% |