Luxembourger vs Burmese Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Burmese
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Luxembourgers
Burmese
2.2%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Burmese Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,609,683 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.046 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,418,489 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.046 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 2.8%.

Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Luxembourger | Burmese |
Minimum | 0.11% | 0.68% |
Maximum | 5.6% | 9.0% |
Range | 5.5% | 8.3% |
Mean | 2.0% | 2.3% |
Median | 1.9% | 2.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.3% | 1.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 2.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 0.51% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.0% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.0% | 1.1% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Burmese by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Okinawan (2.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Ethiopian (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Kuwait (2.2%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (2.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (2.2%, a difference of 0.71%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Danish (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Paraguayan (2.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Korea (2.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (2.3%, a difference of 0.41%), and Inupiat (2.2%, a difference of 0.50%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Inupiat | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Danes | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 2.3% |