Luxembourger vs Burmese Vision Disability
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Burmese
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Luxembourgers
Burmese
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
1.8%
VISION DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Burmese Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,652,316 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.111 and weighted average of 1.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,767,032 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.089 and weighted average of 1.8%, a difference of 4.8%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Luxembourger | Burmese |
Minimum | 0.43% | 0.21% |
Maximum | 5.3% | 5.6% |
Range | 4.8% | 5.4% |
Mean | 1.7% | 1.6% |
Median | 1.6% | 1.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.2% | 1.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.0% | 1.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.84% | 0.43% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.90% | 0.68% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.89% | 0.67% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Burmese by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Mongolian (1.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Egypt (1.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Nepal (1.9%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Turkey (1.9%, a difference of 0.43%), and Egyptian (1.9%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Indian (Asian) (1.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Bolivian (1.9%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Bolivia (1.8%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from China (1.8%, a difference of 0.87%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (1.9%, a difference of 1.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 1.9% |