Latvian vs Immigrants from Western Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,227,741 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Africa within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.201. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.063% in Immigrants from Western Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to a decrease of 62.7 Immigrants from Western Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $40,294, a difference of 30.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $85,676, a difference of 27.1%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $94,638, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $49,621, a difference of 6.4%), median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $39,351, a difference of 11.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $57,119, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 61.0%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 51.8%), and married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.35%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 27.8%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.68%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 54.5%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 29.7%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.62%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.29, a difference of 5.9%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 53.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 14.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 6.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 67.1%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 55.9%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 18.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.070%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.6%).