Latvian vs Delaware Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,164,155 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Delaware within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.678. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.857% in Delaware. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 856.6 Delaware.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Delaware communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $40,778, a difference of 29.1%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $96,958, a difference of 24.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $94,914, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.9%), householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $47,159, a difference of 11.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $58,214, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Delaware communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 33.4%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 29.9%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 8.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Delaware communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 44.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 33.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Delaware communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Delaware communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 24.4%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.3%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 2.2%), family households (62.8% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Delaware communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 18.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 11.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.72%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Delaware communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 72.4%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 63.9%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Delaware communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 34.4%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 26.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 4.6%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 13.8%).