Latvian vs Luxembourger Vision Disability
COMPARE
Latvian
Luxembourger
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Latvians
Luxembourgers
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Luxembourger Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,626,631 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,652,316 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.111 and weighted average of 1.9%, a difference of 2.3%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Latvian | Luxembourger |
| Minimum | 0.25% | 0.43% |
| Maximum | 7.5% | 5.3% |
| Range | 7.3% | 4.8% |
| Mean | 2.4% | 1.7% |
| Median | 1.9% | 1.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 1.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.8% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 0.84% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 0.90% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 0.89% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Luxembourgers by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Afghan (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Israeli (2.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.0%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from Sweden (2.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and Ethiopian (2.0%, a difference of 0.59%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Mongolian (1.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Egypt (1.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Nepal (1.9%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Turkey (1.9%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Australia (1.9%, a difference of 0.53%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Cambodians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Cypriots | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.7 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Ethiopians | 99.7 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Latvians | 99.5 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Afghans | 99.5 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.0% |