Iroquois vs Subsaharan African Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Iroquois
Subsaharan African
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Iroquois
Sub-Saharan Africans
43.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
41.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
303rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Subsaharan African Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,249,804 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.281 and weighted average of 43.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,572,233 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.143 and weighted average of 41.6%, a difference of 5.1%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 9.6% | 11.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 72.3% |
Range | 90.4% | 60.5% |
Mean | 45.4% | 38.7% |
Median | 46.1% | 38.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 40.2% | 34.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 52.1% | 43.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.0% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.2% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.0% | 11.5% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Central American Indian (43.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Blackfeet (43.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Cameroon (43.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Alaskan Athabascan (43.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and Ugandan (43.8%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Seminole | 0.4 /100 | #252 | Tragic 44.0% |
Central Americans | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 43.9% |
Apache | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 43.9% |
Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 43.9% |
Ugandans | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 43.8% |
Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 43.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 43.8% |
Iroquois | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 43.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 43.7% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 43.6% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 43.6% |
Cree | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 43.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 43.5% |
Moroccans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 43.5% |
Ecuadorians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 43.5% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Honduras (41.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Guyana (41.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Bahamas (41.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Sioux (41.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Belize (41.8%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 41.9% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 41.8% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 41.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 41.8% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 41.8% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 41.7% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 41.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 41.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 41.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 41.5% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 41.4% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 41.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 41.4% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 41.2% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 41.2% |