Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chilean Births to Unmarried Women

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 151,670,112 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 30.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,289,700 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.644 and weighted average of 30.7%, a difference of 1.1%.

Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina	Chilean
Minimum	11.7%	10.9%
Maximum	65.3%	100.0%
Range	53.6%	89.1%
Mean	33.3%	40.9%
Median	29.5%	32.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	25.3%	27.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	42.7%	44.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	17.4%	17.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	13.8%	23.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	13.6%	23.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chileans by Births to Unmarried Women

In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Immigrants from Spain (30.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (30.3%, a difference of 0.010%), New Zealander (30.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Morocco (30.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (30.4%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Serbian (30.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Oceania (30.6%, a difference of 0.33%), Northern European (30.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from North America (30.6%, a difference of 0.38%), and Czech (30.5%, a difference of 0.48%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Births to Unmarried Women
Immigrants \| Spain	85.8 /100 \| #129	Excellent 30.3%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	85.7 /100 \| #130	Excellent 30.3%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	85.7 /100 \| #131	Excellent 30.3%
New Zealanders	85.5 /100 \| #132	Excellent 30.3%
Immigrants \| Morocco	85.2 /100 \| #133	Excellent 30.4%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	85.2 /100 \| #134	Excellent 30.4%
Brazilians	84.8 /100 \| #135	Excellent 30.4%
Immigrants \| Scotland	84.6 /100 \| #136	Excellent 30.4%
Immigrants \| Philippines	83.9 /100 \| #137	Excellent 30.4%
Puget Sound Salish	83.9 /100 \| #138	Excellent 30.4%
Immigrants \| Canada	83.7 /100 \| #139	Excellent 30.4%
Swiss	83.1 /100 \| #140	Excellent 30.5%
Pakistanis	83.0 /100 \| #141	Excellent 30.5%
South Africans	82.7 /100 \| #142	Excellent 30.5%
Immigrants \| Uganda	82.6 /100 \| #143	Excellent 30.5%
Czechs	82.1 /100 \| #144	Excellent 30.5%
Immigrants \| North America	81.5 /100 \| #145	Excellent 30.6%
Northern Europeans	81.4 /100 \| #146	Excellent 30.6%
Immigrants \| Oceania	81.2 /100 \| #147	Excellent 30.6%
Chileans	79.1 /100 \| #148	Good 30.7%
Serbians	78.8 /100 \| #149	Good 30.7%