Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chilean Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,293,901 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 255,436,750 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 2.2%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina	Chilean
Minimum	0.92%	1.1%
Maximum	15.1%	14.3%
Range	14.1%	13.2%
Mean	4.8%	5.3%
Median	3.9%	4.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	2.3%	3.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	5.1%	6.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.7%	3.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.5%	3.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.5%	2.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chileans by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Romanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Asia (4.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Egyptian (4.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Jordanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and White/Caucasian (4.8%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Guamanian/Chamorro (4.9%, a difference of 0.13%), German Russian (5.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Portugal (5.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Brazil (5.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Hungary (4.9%, a difference of 0.75%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Indians (Asian)	93.2 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 4.8%
Whites/Caucasians	93.1 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 4.8%
Jordanians	93.1 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 4.8%
Romanians	92.5 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	92.5 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Asia	92.3 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 4.8%
Egyptians	92.0 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 4.8%
Palestinians	91.2 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 4.9%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	90.7 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 4.9%
Soviet Union	90.7 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 4.9%
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	90.5 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 4.9%
Puget Sound Salish	90.4 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 4.9%
Immigrants \| Kenya	90.2 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 4.9%
Samoans	90.2 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 4.9%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	89.4 /100 \| #135	Excellent 4.9%
Immigrants \| Hungary	88.7 /100 \| #136	Excellent 4.9%
Guamanians/Chamorros	86.5 /100 \| #137	Excellent 4.9%
Chileans	86.0 /100 \| #138	Excellent 4.9%
German Russians	85.1 /100 \| #139	Excellent 5.0%
Immigrants \| Portugal	84.8 /100 \| #140	Excellent 5.0%
Immigrants \| Brazil	84.6 /100 \| #141	Excellent 5.0%