Celtic vs Immigrants from Thailand Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Celtic
Immigrants from Thailand
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Celtics
Immigrants from Thailand
2.6%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
4.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.6%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
4.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Immigrants from Thailand Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,804,948 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.916 and weighted average of 2.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,791,227 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.126 and weighted average of 2.6%, a difference of 0.040%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | Immigrants from Thailand |
| Minimum | 0.75% | 0.83% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 6.9% |
| Range | 49.3% | 6.1% |
| Mean | 4.6% | 3.0% |
| Median | 2.8% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.1% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 0.94% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 1.4% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and Immigrants from Thailand by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are White/Caucasian (2.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Scotch-Irish (2.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Ecuadorian (2.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Honduras (2.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Moldova (2.6%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are White/Caucasian (2.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Honduras (2.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Ecuadorian (2.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Scotch-Irish (2.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and Samoan (2.6%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 10.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.5% |
| French | 9.9 /100 | #207 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Central Americans | 8.7 /100 | #208 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Malaysians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Panamanians | 6.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 5.1 /100 | #211 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Samoans | 5.1 /100 | #212 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Ecuadorians | 4.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 4.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #215 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 4.4 /100 | #216 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Celtics | 4.4 /100 | #217 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Scotch-Irish | 4.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 4.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Hondurans | 3.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Spaniards | 3.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 2.6% |
| French Canadians | 3.8 /100 | #223 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Osage | 3.6 /100 | #224 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Iraqis | 3.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Chinese | 2.9 /100 | #226 | Tragic 2.6% |