Immigrants from Philippines vs Slavic Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Philippines
Slavic
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Philippines
Slavs
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
96.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Philippines vs Slavic Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,729,486 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.163 and weighted average of 8.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,374,378 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.748 and weighted average of 8.1%, a difference of 0.92%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Philippines | Slavic |
Minimum | 1.1% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 24.5% | 33.0% |
Range | 23.5% | 30.8% |
Mean | 7.7% | 9.1% |
Median | 7.4% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.7% | 10.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Philippines and Slavs by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Immigrants from Pakistan (8.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Turkey (8.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Tlingit-Haida (8.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Czechoslovakian (8.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (8.1%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from Eastern Europe (8.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Laotian (8.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Indonesia (8.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Norway (8.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and New Zealander (8.1%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Denmark | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Slavs | 95.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Laotians | 95.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Egyptians | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 8.1% |
French Canadians | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Basques | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Jordanians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 8.2% |