Macedonian vs Sri Lankan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Macedonian
Sri Lankan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Macedonians
Sri Lankans
18.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Macedonian vs Sri Lankan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,464,116 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.010 and weighted average of 18.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 433,414,955 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.182 and weighted average of 19.2%, a difference of 1.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Macedonian | Sri Lankan |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 4.9% |
| Maximum | 40.0% | 56.0% |
| Range | 37.0% | 51.1% |
| Mean | 17.9% | 20.4% |
| Median | 17.6% | 18.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.9% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.4% | 22.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 10.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 10.3% |
Demographics Similar to Macedonians and Sri Lankans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Immigrants from Indonesia (18.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Latvian (19.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Croatia (18.9%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Argentina (19.0%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Bulgaria (19.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Russian (19.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Cambodian (19.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Lithuanian (19.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and Eastern European (19.1%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Cambodians | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 19.2% |