European vs Choctaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
European
Choctaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Europeans
Choctaw
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
42.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
181st/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
European vs Choctaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 543,036,354 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Europeans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.705 and weighted average of 21.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,534,581 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.421 and weighted average of 27.2%, a difference of 28.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | European | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 15.3% | 12.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 84.7% | 87.4% |
| Mean | 43.6% | 41.2% |
| Median | 30.4% | 38.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.6% | 31.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 56.6% | 46.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 36.0% | 15.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.1% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 27.9% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Europeans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Europeans are Spanish American Indian (21.1%, a difference of 0.010%), British (21.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Slavic (21.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (21.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Slovak (21.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
| British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
| Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
| Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
| Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
| Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
| Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Creek (27.4%, a difference of 0.88%), Dutch West Indian (27.5%, a difference of 0.96%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |