Ethiopian vs Inupiat Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Inupiat
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Ethiopians
Inupiat
19.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
96.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Inupiat Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,686,273 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 19.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,986,972 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161 and weighted average of 23.1%, a difference of 16.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ethiopian | Inupiat |
| Minimum | 4.8% | 8.3% |
| Maximum | 33.2% | 73.6% |
| Range | 28.4% | 65.3% |
| Mean | 18.6% | 30.3% |
| Median | 18.8% | 24.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.6% | 17.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.9% | 40.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 23.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 18.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 18.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Syria (19.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Native Hawaiian (19.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Colombian (19.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Western Asia (19.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Israeli (19.9%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Sierra Leoneans | 97.9 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Ukrainians | 97.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 97.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 97.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 97.1 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Chileans | 96.9 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Israelis | 96.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Ethiopians | 96.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Demographics Similar to Inupiat by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Subsaharan African (23.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Hmong (23.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Fijian (23.1%, a difference of 0.28%), Senegalese (23.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (23.0%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |