Ethiopian In Labor Force | Age 20-24
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Ethiopian In Labor Force | Age 20-24
77.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-24
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,247,985 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.412 and weighted average of 77.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.79% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Ethiopians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Ethiopians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 within an area, or if Ethiopians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians by In Labor Force | Age 20-24
In terms of in labor force | age 20-24, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Serbian (77.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (77.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Chinese (77.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Native Hawaiian (77.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and Fijian (77.4%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-24 |
| Scottish | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 77.4% |
| Immigrants from Congo | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 77.4% |
| French | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 77.4% |
| Immigrants from Laos | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 77.4% |
| Fijians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 77.4% |
| Native Hawaiians | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 77.4% |
| Samoans | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 77.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 77.3% |
| Serbians | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 77.3% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 77.3% |
| Malaysians | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 77.2% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 77.2% |
| Indonesians | 100.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 77.2% |
| Immigrants from the Azores | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 77.2% |
| Celtics | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 77.1% |
Ethiopian In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ethiopian Data | In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Data |
| Minimum | 0.064% | 55.1% |
| Maximum | 20.7% | 100.0% |
| Range | 20.6% | 44.9% |
| Mean | 5.6% | 79.6% |
| Median | 4.8% | 79.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 75.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 82.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 8.3% |
Correlation Details
| Ethiopian Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 20-24 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.064% | 143,251,231 | 74.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 34,859,537 | 75.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.40% | 14,257,298 | 75.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.56% | 7,871,621 | 77.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.74% | 3,681,815 | 75.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.91% | 3,648,021 | 77.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 2,842,926 | 75.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 2,517,090 | 78.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 1,584,290 | 78.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.56% | 1,750,526 | 80.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 964,864 | 79.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 807,230 | 78.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.07% | 384,098 | 80.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.21% | 545,505 | 77.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.39% | 176,307 | 81.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.55% | 381,336 | 74.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 263,366 | 78.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.92% | 211,919 | 77.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.00% | 469,301 | 80.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.22% | 236,126 | 79.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.38% | 286,416 | 82.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.54% | 229,912 | 78.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.65% | 62,039 | 72.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.84% | 100,273 | 75.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.03% | 156,701 | 83.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.18% | 125,408 | 81.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.36% | 78,603 | 83.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.52% | 264,356 | 79.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 48,890 | 80.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.82% | 84,569 | 81.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.03% | 132,495 | 73.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.23% | 164,741 | 75.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.33% | 55,439 | 80.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.53% | 92,792 | 84.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.69% | 26,996 | 73.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.78% | 4,017 | 85.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.02% | 26,595 | 75.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.18% | 45,072 | 89.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.33% | 44,863 | 81.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.71% | 14,098 | 56.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.89% | 61,169 | 73.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.05% | 24,581 | 66.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 101,620 | 86.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.43% | 26,573 | 76.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.74% | 18,324 | 90.9% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.40% | 30,927 | 73.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.65% | 64,730 | 73.4% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.36% | 25,823 | 84.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.44% | 50,049 | 84.6% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.81% | 38,318 | 67.7% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.10% | 1,050 | 55.1% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.38% | 5,359 | 95.9% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.67% | 26,684 | 79.9% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.73% | 1,885 | 100.0% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.66% | 3,514 | 100.0% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.16% | 4,023 | 93.6% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.31% | 14,553 | 80.2% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.66% | 121 | 100.0% |