Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from Panama Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from England
Immigrants from Panama
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from England
Immigrants from Panama
3.3%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
76.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from Panama Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 391,804,752 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.707 and weighted average of 3.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,167,736 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Panama and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.892 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 14.9%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from England | Immigrants from Panama |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 37.3% | 24.8% |
| Range | 35.7% | 23.7% |
| Mean | 6.6% | 6.0% |
| Median | 5.0% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Lithuanian (3.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Scotland (3.3%, a difference of 0.28%), Austrian (3.4%, a difference of 0.42%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (3.3%, a difference of 0.62%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (3.3%, a difference of 0.69%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Nepalese | 1.2 /100 | #239 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 1.1 /100 | #240 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Samoans | 1.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Yugoslavians | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 1.0 /100 | #243 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 0.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 0.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 0.7 /100 | #246 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lithuanians | 0.6 /100 | #247 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Austrians | 0.6 /100 | #248 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Italians | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Yuman | 0.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Hungarians | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Croatians | 0.4 /100 | #252 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Panama by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Panama are Immigrants from Russia (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Tongan (2.9%, a difference of 0.25%), Brazilian (2.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Congo (2.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |