Immigrants from Belgium vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belgium
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Belgium
Chickasaw
3.0%
HEARING DISABILITY
41.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
181st/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belgium vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,709,031 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.530 and weighted average of 3.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 48.3%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Belgium | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.12% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 19.0% | 21.2% |
| Range | 18.9% | 18.8% |
| Mean | 4.8% | 7.4% |
| Median | 3.6% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.8% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belgium by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belgium are Immigrants from Italy (3.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Sweden (3.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Moldova (3.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Bulgarian (3.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Ireland (3.0%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Indonesians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 48.4 /100 | #175 | Average 3.0% |
| Panamanians | 47.0 /100 | #176 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 46.4 /100 | #177 | Average 3.0% |
| Japanese | 46.0 /100 | #178 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 43.1 /100 | #179 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 42.4 /100 | #180 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 41.5 /100 | #181 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 41.1 /100 | #182 | Average 3.0% |
| Bulgarians | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 37.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 35.3 /100 | #185 | Fair 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 34.9 /100 | #186 | Fair 3.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 34.7 /100 | #187 | Fair 3.0% |
| Mexican American Indians | 34.7 /100 | #188 | Fair 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |