Immigrants from Belgium vs Brazilian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belgium
Brazilian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Belgium
Brazilians
3.0%
HEARING DISABILITY
41.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
181st/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
78.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belgium vs Brazilian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,709,031 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.530 and weighted average of 3.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,867,149 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.115 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 4.0%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Belgium | Brazilian |
| Minimum | 0.12% | 0.82% |
| Maximum | 19.0% | 7.3% |
| Range | 18.9% | 6.5% |
| Mean | 4.8% | 3.1% |
| Median | 3.6% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.8% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 0.65% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 1.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belgium by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belgium are Immigrants from Italy (3.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Sweden (3.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Moldova (3.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Bulgarian (3.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Ireland (3.0%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Indonesians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 48.4 /100 | #175 | Average 3.0% |
| Panamanians | 47.0 /100 | #176 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 46.4 /100 | #177 | Average 3.0% |
| Japanese | 46.0 /100 | #178 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 43.1 /100 | #179 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 42.4 /100 | #180 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 41.5 /100 | #181 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 41.1 /100 | #182 | Average 3.0% |
| Bulgarians | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 37.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 35.3 /100 | #185 | Fair 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 34.9 /100 | #186 | Fair 3.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 34.7 /100 | #187 | Fair 3.0% |
| Mexican American Indians | 34.7 /100 | #188 | Fair 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Tongan (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Congo (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Russia (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Panama (2.9%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |