Houma vs Chickasaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Houma
Chickasaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Houma
Chickasaw
3.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma vs Chickasaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,790,703 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.044 and weighted average of 3.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 8.3%.

Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Houma | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.33% |
Maximum | 9.0% | 15.2% |
Range | 7.8% | 14.8% |
Mean | 3.8% | 5.4% |
Median | 3.6% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.4% | 6.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Houma and Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Lumbee (3.4%, a difference of 1.7%), Pueblo (3.3%, a difference of 3.3%), Pima (3.3%, a difference of 3.3%), Choctaw (3.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 5.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 3.0% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 3.0% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |