Immigrants from Iraq vs Chickasaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Iraq
Chickasaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Iraq
Chickasaw
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
64.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Iraq vs Chickasaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,736,421 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iraq and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.145 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 48.2%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3aad/e3aad58294294adbc184111df0e8087553591ecf" alt="Immigrants from Iraq vs Chickasaw Vision Disability"
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Iraq | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.1% | 0.33% |
Maximum | 3.8% | 15.2% |
Range | 2.7% | 14.8% |
Mean | 2.1% | 5.4% |
Median | 2.1% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 6.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.58% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.56% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.56% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Iraq by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Iraq are Immigrants from Bangladesh (2.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Icelander (2.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from England (2.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Africa (2.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Hungarian (2.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 69.9 /100 | #158 | Good 2.1% |
South Africans | 69.8 /100 | #159 | Good 2.1% |
Austrians | 69.0 /100 | #160 | Good 2.1% |
Iraqis | 67.7 /100 | #161 | Good 2.1% |
Hungarians | 67.4 /100 | #162 | Good 2.1% |
Icelanders | 66.1 /100 | #163 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 65.5 /100 | #164 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 64.8 /100 | #165 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | England | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 62.6 /100 | #167 | Good 2.1% |
Brazilians | 62.2 /100 | #168 | Good 2.1% |
South American Indians | 57.4 /100 | #169 | Average 2.2% |
Swiss | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 2.2% |
Lebanese | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 2.2% |
Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172 | Average 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |