Houma vs Apache Vision Disability
COMPARE
Houma
Apache
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Houma
Apache
3.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.0%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma vs Apache Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,790,703 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.044 and weighted average of 3.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 231,003,425 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Apache and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.0%, a difference of 15.1%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Houma | Apache |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.65% |
| Maximum | 9.0% | 10.4% |
| Range | 7.8% | 9.7% |
| Mean | 3.8% | 4.6% |
| Median | 3.6% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.4% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Houma and Apache by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Lumbee (3.4%, a difference of 1.7%), Pueblo (3.3%, a difference of 3.3%), Pima (3.3%, a difference of 3.3%), Choctaw (3.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 5.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Yuman (3.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Native/Alaskan (3.0%, a difference of 0.74%), Colville (3.0%, a difference of 1.2%), Central American Indian (3.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and Seminole (3.1%, a difference of 2.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |