Immigrants from Romania vs Chickasaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Romania
Chickasaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Romania
Chickasaw
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Romania vs Chickasaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,950,873 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.489 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 58.5%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Romania | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.58% | 0.33% |
| Maximum | 12.5% | 15.2% |
| Range | 11.9% | 14.8% |
| Mean | 2.7% | 5.4% |
| Median | 2.0% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.8% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.0% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Romania by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are Immigrants from Belgium (2.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Argentinean (2.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Russia (2.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Armenian (2.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (2.0%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Laotians | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Jordanians | 99.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Argentineans | 99.1 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 99.1 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Armenians | 99.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Maltese | 98.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 98.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |