Immigrants from Oceania vs Chickasaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Chickasaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Chickasaw
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
45.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Chickasaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,325,142 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 46.3%.

Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.72% | 0.33% |
Maximum | 20.2% | 15.2% |
Range | 19.5% | 14.8% |
Mean | 3.5% | 5.4% |
Median | 2.3% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.8% | 6.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from North America (2.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Slavic (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Yugoslavian (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Fiji (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Uruguayan (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Lebanese | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 2.2% |
Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172 | Average 2.2% |
Scandinavians | 50.0 /100 | #173 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 47.6 /100 | #175 | Average 2.2% |
Yugoslavians | 46.5 /100 | #176 | Average 2.2% |
Slavs | 46.0 /100 | #177 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 45.1 /100 | #178 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | North America | 44.5 /100 | #179 | Average 2.2% |
Uruguayans | 42.7 /100 | #180 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 41.1 /100 | #181 | Average 2.2% |
Costa Ricans | 40.7 /100 | #182 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 37.9 /100 | #183 | Fair 2.2% |
Moroccans | 35.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 33.5 /100 | #185 | Fair 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |